As we saw with Arbitrum and Ethereum, Arbitrum overwrote what was confirmed on Ethereum to freeze funds.
Having Proof of Work on the L1 would be useless if the L2 can freeze funds.
Is this already solved? If not, how could it be solved?
As we saw with Arbitrum and Ethereum, Arbitrum overwrote what was confirmed on Ethereum to freeze funds.
Having Proof of Work on the L1 would be useless if the L2 can freeze funds.
Is this already solved? If not, how could it be solved?
It completely depends on the template. If you put some funds/tokens etc in a template, its the template that controls what happens to them. The only thing L1 can control is that the template rules are followed.
Okey, so the L2 validators cannot do a reorg of something that is already confirmed on the L1 in any way, even if the majority wants, but they could only do it doing a hard fork I guess
no they cant, they will only enforce the template rules. If the template rules has something like a this signature can free funds, its in the template rules, they will enfore that.